"It
was in the fervid stirrings of heart religion in the Great-Awakening that the
crucial transition from the "Puritan" to what is sometimes called the
"Methodist" or "Evangelical Age" in American religious
history occurred. The Methodist Age, inaugurated in the 1730s and 40s and
continuing through most of the 19th century, was a time when "vivid
feelings" often took precedence over ideas, new or old, and when modes of
religion spawned by the Awakening came to prevail.”[1]
The broader themes that lie within the Baptist tradition and also fall into
Julia's personal beliefs can be found within moralism and combination. Moralism
refers to codes of conduct put forward by societal groups, for example
religious groups and is accepted by an individual for his or her own behavior.
Among those who use morality, all hold that it refers to a code of conduct that
applies to all who can understand it and can govern their behavior by it. On
the other hand combination religion is viewed as the mixing of multiple
practices taken from different branches of religion. Sometimes the beliefs seem
contradictory while others mend well together. There are many reasons for the
combination of traditional beliefs and unrelated traditions. This occurs for
many reasons such that "where multiple religious traditions exist in
proximity and function actively in the culture, or when a culture is conquered,
and the conquerors bring their religious beliefs with them, but do not succeed
in entirely eradicating the old beliefs or, especially, practices.”[2]
In
Herskovits's words, "the conclusion that we reach is that in Africa, as in
the New World, the cultural processes that will be operative will be those of
addition and synthesis to achieve congruence with older forms, rather than of
subtraction and substitution, with their resulting fragmentation."[3]
Historically, there has been this advocacy for the combination of different
practices in order to keep old traditions along side new traditions. My
friend's personal practices reflect this idea of combination. She attends a
Baptist church where much of the emphasis is on evangelism. However, her
practices combine with other branches of Christianity. For example, she
believes in the usage of sacred images, worship, and transubstantiation used in
Catholicism. She also incorporates a few of their sacraments into her
practices.
Historically,
"the genealogy of syncretism (combination) directs attention to larger,
governments and Churches, that can shape the evaluation, indeed the very
perception, of religious mixture. These institutions are themselves capable of
reversing themselves and changing the rules in order to maintain control.
Likewise, New World nationalisms did not form their positive views of mixture
solely on aesthetic grounds, but in subversive resistance to the colonial
metropolitan arrogation of purity and out of practical need to assemble
numbers."[4]
The
history of "moralism has become aggressive and culture affirming. During
recent decades the heirs of colonial establishment-- the Congregational,
Presbyterian, and Episcopal denominations; of frontier achievement-- the
Northern Baptist, Methodist, and Disciples of Christ denominations; and of
continental immigration-- the Lutheran and Reformed denominations-- ironically
came to be called "mainline" at precisely the moment when their place
was being challenged. They had long been custodians of the cultural lore, had
had access to power all the way to the White House, and had occupied a
privileged status in the national ethos, although not in law.”[5]
Julia's practices
of morality are all self-reflective. She makes up the rules she wants to abide
by. For example, her rejection of the excessive party scene is viewed as
immoral while others see this as solely having a good time. When talking to
her, it is clear that she sets up these standards for herself that pressure her
into living by a strict code of what appears to be old-fashioned societal views
on morality and immorality. Overall, she leads a life where she strives to do
well, helps those around her, and develops her own personal relationship with
God. She attends a Baptist church that seems to work for her but she also
combines different practices from outside religions. In many ways her beliefs
are somewhat individualistic.
[1] LeRoy
Moore, Jr. “The Spiritual: Soul of Black Religion.”
American Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 5 pp 658-676. (The Johns Hopkins University
Press), 658-659.
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syncretism
[3]
Charles Stewart. “Syncretism and Its Synonyms: Reflections on Cultural
Mixture.” Diacritics, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 40-62. (The John Hopkins University
Press), 50.
[4]
Stewart, 54.
[5]
Martin E. Marty, “Annals of the American
Academy of Political and Social Science.” Vol. 480, Religion in America
Today, pp 11-23. (Sage Publications, Inc.), 13.
Both our person's religious history is similar in that combinations of religions have influenced their way of life. I believe that to be a pattern that exists in most of the religions that exist in America and taking into account individualism since it affects people differently. Religion has become not only a choice but a way of life.
ReplyDeleteI also mention how culture affects religion. Do you think that culture and individualism mediate religion?